Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

April 29, 2024, 9:05 pm UTC    
January 16, 2013 03:49AM
The measuring rod in the book of Ezekiel was 6 long cubits of 7 palms and equal to 7 cubits of 6 palms.

The standard biblical cubit was 6 palms, and is well described in the book of Ezekiel.


The biblical 'long cubit' was a cubit and a palm, and 6 plus 1 equals 7.


The common or ordinary Egyptian cubit, now labelled the royal cubit, had 7 palms.

Sir Isaac Newton thought that the Egyptian cubit used at Giza had 6 palms, but he was wrong. Greaves' incorrect drawing of the Grand Gallery showed six overlaps on the side walls, but there are actually seven.


Take the standard cubit, from elbow to finger tip of middle finger, as equal to 6 palms:

For casual measurements in long cubits start by placing the palm of the right hand behind the elbow of the left arm as the first long cubit; then transfer the palm of the right hand to the middle finger of the left arm, followed by the cubit of the left arm for the second long cubit.

I often use my feet for measurement when doing sketches and casual surveys of engineering plant, and did so just last week. The long cubit was a practical tool for measurements. I have found that I can measure very quickly along a wall or on the top of a bench in 'long cubits'. Measurements are surprisingly quick and accurate in long cubits, palms and digits, and easy to convert to inches or metres if you know the length of your cubit, and the width of your palm.

It is extremely difficult to measure in standard cubits without a measuring rod, as it is difficult to see behind the back of the elbow.

The biblical long cubit has the same biological basis as the Egyptian royal cubit, but this does not mean that it was exactly the same length.

Mark
Subject Author Posted

Cubits British inch connection

Rigel_7 January 14, 2013 11:41AM

Re: Final proof of pyramid inch?

Mark Heaton January 14, 2013 02:40PM

Re: Final proof of pyramid inch?

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 09:17AM

Re: Final proof of pyramid inch?

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 11:45AM

Re: Final proof of pyramid inch?

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 12:58PM

Re: Final proof of pyramid inch?

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 02:09PM

Re: How to be scientific about measurements

Mark Heaton January 15, 2013 02:33PM

Re: How to be scientific about measurements

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 04:34PM

Re: How to be scientific about measurements

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 06:21PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Mark Heaton January 15, 2013 06:29PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 15, 2013 06:41PM

Re: The division of the royal cubit into 7 palms

Mark Heaton January 16, 2013 03:49AM

Re: The division of the royal cubit into 7 palms

Rigel_7 January 16, 2013 09:05AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rodders January 16, 2013 08:20AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 16, 2013 10:44PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 07:32AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 08:06AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 09:16AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 10:20AM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rodders January 17, 2013 03:14PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 04:21PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rodders January 17, 2013 05:28PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 07:21PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 17, 2013 07:53PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rodders January 18, 2013 02:56PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rigel_7 January 18, 2013 05:38PM

Re: How to calculate a triangle?

Rodders January 18, 2013 06:47PM

Re: OCT, or geometry, or perspective?

Mark Heaton January 19, 2013 05:53AM

Re: OCT, or geometry, or perspective?

Rigel_7 January 19, 2013 07:26AM

Re: Back to geometry

Mark Heaton January 19, 2013 08:42AM

Re: Back to geometry

Rigel_7 January 19, 2013 10:27AM

Re: Back to geometry

Mark Heaton January 19, 2013 12:17PM

Re: Back to geometry

Rigel_7 January 19, 2013 02:09PM

Re: Back to geometry

Rigel_7 January 20, 2013 08:17AM

Re: Back to geometry

Hermione January 20, 2013 08:33AM

Re: Back to geometry

Rigel_7 January 20, 2013 09:32AM

Re: Back to geometry

Rodders January 20, 2013 02:06PM

Re: Back to geometry

Rigel_7 January 20, 2013 03:18PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login