That vertical line that I mentioned I hasd to set at 0.2 degrees East of vertical to get the perfect 3:4:5 triangle was actually 0.2 degrees West. I was reading it wrong in the program. So in other words, it's angled in the same direction as the GP azimuth is angled, westward. That makes it even more accurate than I first thought. For instance, the East side of G1 has an azimuth of 0.0556 degrees West of true N/S. So the difference is only about 0.15 degree. That's pretty much negligible.

I'm actually rather shocked that somebody on one of these forums actually discovered some legitimate Giza geometry. It wasn't even something obvious either. Well done Rodders.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 01/11/2013 04:57PM by Rigel_7.