Any sufficiently large mass of mathematical data points can be selectively filtered into a subset of data points that can appear to support virtually any conclusion.

This is re-enforced when you start with with 30 and 45 degree right triangles and unity circles. A little creative work and I can show how Giza maps out continents.



That doesn't invalidate your data at all, nor would you be able to invalidate a Gizoid map of continents. However, it does show that your theory does not hold any special merit (at this time). If you can find *any* concrete evidence of knowledge of the planetary motions and the encoding of same into other artifacts, then you would be on a correct path.

Without that, all you have is a described coincidence misperceived as an anomaly founded upon a selectively chosen set of data points.

FYI - if you've found sq rt of 2 and 3 out there, you should also find the sq rt of 5... it's there if the other two are.