Hi Sir

Yes I have seen that many times. Problem is John works on a grade school level on all of these projects and although he tries to evaluate individual trees he can not see the forest. His work is too simplistic and he rounds off way too much. He doesn't use the data as recorded. Nevertheless it is interesting and I have gleamed much from his work. In my estimation it is like the various theories used to set the three main pyramids to the stars but they never try to explain anything else. In my opinion very shallow work. Any explanation of Giza must include all ten pyramids and all the other 3rd and 4th dynasty ones as well. He introduces a 2 dimensional solution when there are three dimensions and many other things to tie in.

The 3rd and 4th dynasties were unique and it is here we will find the true roots of our mathematical heritage.

Meanwhile thunderstorm moving in so I might be off the air for a while (till morning) as I shut down to protect my hard drives.

Regards
Don Barone

"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db