Hi Warwick,

Warwick wrote: If you mean what is/are my belief/conclusions based on....the sum total of my research.

So is it just a belief without expressible evidence to back it up? Why would you choose to believe something that has basis in non expressible criteria?

No disrespect intended, just expressing an opinion here, but let me attempt answer that question for you! It is something which you were obviously taught by rote indoctrination and kindheartedly believe it to be correct, whether it is true or not!

There is a genius in the mathematics of the Pyramids that would stagger most imaginations; because of the information obtained by rote indoctrination most would be unable to see that genius. Just my humble opinion: it would be highly unlikely you would wish to see anything that does not conform to your preconceived perspective of the Ancient Egyptian peoples created by the rote indoctrination because you are so secure in your knowledge regarding this culture being correct. This is propagating the "I can't see anything there, so there isn't anything there to see" logic, that is prolific amongst much of academia today.

Tell me Warwick,Is there really any point in having a discussions when one of those involved is so absolutely sure he is correct and assuredly there is no way he can be wrong? In my humble opinion there are individuals on this message board who suffer this affliction. When it comes to alternative research and new information, they resort to ridicule and harassment of the messenger rather than engaging in debate and offering proof the material’s error. Is it because there are no valid proofs to be offered rebutting the subject matter? You ask alternative researchers for proofs of beliefs and theories, when you are unable produce anything other than speculations and consensus to support your own. Speculation and consensus is not science, it is a poor basis on which to build a perspective.