Sirfiroth Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Warwick,
>
> Warwick wrote: that's the point...using simple
> sekeds was the most efficient, if not the only
> way, for the plan...any plan... to be applied by
> the workers.
>
> Are you saying we should ignore the other
> mathematical values demonstrated by the seked
> ratios of the 5 main pyramids of Dashur and Giza
> such as:

Other than size..for what reason do you limit pyramid construction design and execution to these 5?


>
> 1. 44/63 = (44/7 / 9) (2pi/9)
> 2. 21 * 22 = (22/7 / 3) (pi/3)
> 3. 140/99 = rational square root 2
> 4. 99/70 = rational square root 2
>
> Not only are these ratios present between the
> seked ratios of the Pyramids,

What do you mean by Between the Sekeds?

but these values
> present themselves in size relationships,
> base:base, height:height, between the Pyramids.

again what do you mean by Between the pyramids?
>
> Regards,
> Jacob


Warwick




" I have always found that the main obstacle to free
association on these boards is the broad
misconception that what we do not know is more
significant than what we do know."

Warwick L Nixon, March 8, 2019