Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> BTW...why did you introduce the south-west
> socket...the smallest of the four?

Because you wrote, "the four corner casing stones sit in huge holes that were never required."

Whereas about the south-west socket Rutherford wrote: "..this socket is so shallow that it can scarcely can be said to be sunk into the rock at all; indeed the outer edges at the western end of it are merely incised lines in the rock." (Pyramidology. Book II 244-245).

This prompted me to ask you how you reconciled your statement about the depth of the sockets (which as you now rightly point out varies from socket to socket) with Rutherford's.
I am concerned here not with the measurements socket to socket (thus rendering your, "You are viewing this pyramid looking west....not east", etc., totally irrelevant) but with what I see as yet another example of sloppy research on your part.

MJ

We can't all be right, but we could all be wrong ...