Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 18, 2024, 9:35 am UTC    
November 06, 2009 11:45AM
Clive wrote
M&R wrote a book regarding the GP but never set a ruler to the structure.

Absolute rubbish and a gross insult to two eminent researchers who are no longer able to defend themselves.

Their drawings are a combination of their own measurements, many of which are available nowhere else, and the work of others which they are always careful to label as such.

There are mistakes but their work still represents the best there is on the Great Pyramid.

Your inaccurate and dismissive remark is sadly typical of much of your approach to the work of others who you are always quick to disparage when they show up all too clearly the limitations of your own attempts at research.

You've been similarly innacurate in your remarks about Vyse, Smyth and Petrie over the years but never actually produce any proof that such remarks are justified.

All very shabby in my opinion.
Subject Author Posted

Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 02, 2009 02:32PM

an error in Petrie?

Warwick L Nixon November 02, 2009 04:56PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 02, 2009 05:38PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

tim November 13, 2009 06:05AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Dave Lightbody November 13, 2009 06:34AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

tim November 13, 2009 07:10AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 13, 2009 11:34AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 13, 2009 12:34PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 13, 2009 01:02PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 13, 2009 11:14AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 02, 2009 07:40PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

RLH November 02, 2009 08:01PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 02, 2009 09:08PM

Woops...!

Clive November 03, 2009 12:14AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 03, 2009 07:50AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 03, 2009 07:40PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 04, 2009 12:19PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 04, 2009 12:43PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 04, 2009 04:26PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 04, 2009 04:29PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 04, 2009 05:36PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 04, 2009 07:48PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 06, 2009 12:17AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 06, 2009 11:45AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 06, 2009 03:07PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 06, 2009 03:00PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jim Alison November 09, 2009 11:09PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login