Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 17, 2024, 5:53 am UTC    
November 02, 2009 05:38PM
Hello Jon,

This is something of an odd error, to say the least.

The horizontal measurements after Petrie are:
North side at base to foot of entrance = 525.63” to 526.96”
Foot of entrance to Descending Passage/Ascending Passage floor line intersection = 994.17” to 994.3”

Therefore North side at base to Descending Passage/Ascending Passage floor line intersection =
from 525.63” + 994.17” = 1519.8”
to 526.96” + 994.3” = 1521.26”
mean 1520.53” +/- 0.73”

From Descending Passage/Ascending Passage floor line intersection to Ascending Passage floor/Grand Gallery north wall intersection (a.k.a. horizontal length of Ascending Passage) = 1389.5”

From Ascending Passage floor/Grand Gallery north wall intersection to east apex of Queens' Chamber = 1626.5”

From east apex of Queens' Chamber to top of Chamber doorway at north-east corner = 102.6”

Therefore north side at base to top of Chamber doorway at north-east corner = mean 1520.53” +/- 0.73” + 1389.5” + 1626.5” - 102.6” = 4433.93” +/- 0.73”

If you take his accumulative measurement for the west apex of the Queens' Chamber as given @ 4533.8 and deduct from this his actual measurement for from west apex to north wall of Chamber @ 103”, then you are still left with an error, i.e. 28.7”.

Try as I may, I cannot see how Petrie arrived at 4402.1” for this total measurement.

MJ
Subject Author Posted

Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 02, 2009 02:32PM

an error in Petrie?

Warwick L Nixon November 02, 2009 04:56PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 02, 2009 05:38PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

tim November 13, 2009 06:05AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Dave Lightbody November 13, 2009 06:34AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

tim November 13, 2009 07:10AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 13, 2009 11:34AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 13, 2009 12:34PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 13, 2009 01:02PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 13, 2009 11:14AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 02, 2009 07:40PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

RLH November 02, 2009 08:01PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 02, 2009 09:08PM

Woops...!

Clive November 03, 2009 12:14AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 03, 2009 07:50AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 03, 2009 07:40PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 04, 2009 12:19PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 04, 2009 12:43PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 04, 2009 04:26PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Don Barone November 04, 2009 04:29PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 04, 2009 05:36PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 04, 2009 07:48PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Clive November 06, 2009 12:17AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jon_B November 06, 2009 11:45AM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 06, 2009 03:07PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

MJ Thomas 2 November 06, 2009 03:00PM

Re: Since we're checking things, an error in Petrie? (surely not...)

Jim Alison November 09, 2009 11:09PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login