Hi Don,

With all due respect Don, what you have presented is in no way proof of your claim, it has never been proven the Ancient Egyptians even knew or understood the concept of pi, much less phi. Pi and phi are Greek mathematical concepts that according to all information were unknown to the Ancient Egyptians. So unless you can present some additional evidence to support your theory it would seem to be dead at conception.

Why do we see pi?
It is possible to square a circle using the 14/11 seked, demonstrated by G1, without the use of pi. As I have stated many times before the only reason we see pi is because of what we were taught, making it is necessary to invoke pi to interpret what the AE presented since we know no other method. The 14/11 seked method is reinforced by the fact that when asked to calculate the area of a circle (RMP50) did so by squaring 8/9 diameter of the circle.

Using 14/11 seked to calculate the area of a circle:

(diameter of circle ^2) / 14/11 = area of circle
(side of square ^2) * 14/11 = area of circle

What these formulas state is the circumference of a circle with a diameter of 14 units is equal to the perimeter of a square of with a side length of 11 units, as illustrated by G1.

Proofing for Comparison:
(22 r^2)/7 is not part of AE equation, but is what we see in lieu of what the AE did in their process and is only to demonstrate equality of process.

(d^2) / 14/11 = area of a circle = (22 r^2)/7
or
(s^2 14)/11 = area of a circle = (22 r^2)/7

It is easy to illustrate the Ancient Egyptians used the 14/11 method for calculating the various parts of a squared circle not only with G1,but measures and locations of the Pyramids.

Regards,
Jacob