Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Khazar-khum Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Would you prefer we use radians?
>
> There's a problem with radians Khazar...the
> concept is good but it doesn't work that well.

What???

> To demonstrate pi degrees or even twice its value
> would be too small an angle to claim it part of an
> intentional design.

But you proposed a 1000 degree circle. Aren't those units too small?



> To factor/multiply a number/angle by ten, as
> demonstrated, makes it easier to detect.
> A system should be used that falls within the
> central part of the structure. That's why the
> 100/pi and the 20 times pi is ideal.
> If you use radians (57.30 degrees per
> radian)...then you are automatically working with
> divisions of pi...that's not practical.

Why not? The scientific community finds it quite workable.

The
> fractions you would be working with are too
> cumbersome. The circle of 360 is operational
> friendly, the best overall, since it is divisible
> by the numbers 1 thru 9, excluding the number 7.

But the AE didn't use that. Your proposed 1000 degree circle exists only in your work. No one else does that.

>
> There is one other factor...the structure has two
> designs. The one shown is derived from the base
> casing stone measures. The structure, as viewed
> today, (275 high) provides more accurate
> measures.



That's your theory.

If the pyramid has *any* mathematical significance outside of being a design that used geometry, then those designs/angles/degrees would only function on the pyramid when it was intact. The AE would not base such a complex system as yours on an unfinished/partially dismantled building.

Why not?

Well, for one thing, how could anyone alive in Khufu's court predict with any certainty which blocks would be removed, and to what level?

They could not know that casing stones would be removed. In fact, it was designed for them NOT to be moved. Since they could not possibly know which stones would be taken (if any) and which would be remaining, they could not & WOULD not use a system that required the removal of stones.

Your theory, as you yourself admit, works best with the pyramid in its current condition. But the current pyramid is not the one designed--it's been mutilated. Therefore, the ONLY systems which might work must use the original pyramid and not the current ruin. And since you need the damaged pyramid to get your numbers to fit, you've chosen to ignore the AE work in favor of your own.

Therefore, no matter how many charts, CADs, ink or time is wasted by you, you are going nowhere. You can do math till the Sun decides to nova and it still won't change the fact that you are working from a faulty base.