Khazar-khum Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> No, Clive. You won't give answers.

Khazar:

I must admit...you are persistent...
You ask...I answer...and you go away.

> Degrees as a measurement for circles are universally accepted.

That is in your book of math and your schooled train of thought and that is not my problem...it's yours. Start thinking like as an educated adult...not as a child lead by the hand.

> I'd ask why you're doing this...

Are you aware of what is being mathematically presented?
Do you realize the mathematical odds of this being coincidental...do you have any idea whatsoever?

> but the real answer isn't the one you're likely to give.

I'm presenting a mathematical fact...I'm not proposing a theory or claiming anything.
This illustration, coupled with the previous, indicates a greater understanding of circular measure than even I assumed possible.

If it is by design then it's a remarkable perception and demonstration of mathematical knowledge relating to circular measure. But it must be clearly understood...it's also simple to calculate...nothing complicated here.

However, if it is coincidental then so be it. Fortunately I know it isn't, otherwise, if you knew me better, I would have never posted either of these illustrations.

Best.
Clive