MJ Thomas Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Okay, so your post is not concerned with the
> apexes of Relieving Chambers and the Queen’s
> Chamber, nor is it concerned with the courses of
> the superstructure.
> Well, I been busy working on your diagram and I
> conclude that it is in fact totally meaningless.
MJ:
I know you do because you cannot see the relevance of the post...you forgot something.
> Projecting a line at 31.812 degrees from the south
> base as you have done will naturally produce the
> 62.831 degrees in your diagram, and vice versa.
Good work....finally...!
Now think of these two statements...first...you can't see...second you tell me where a line would automatically fall.
what is it going to be?
Can you see (mathematically ) or not...?
You wanted evidence of a 360 degrees circle used at Giza...right?
I asked four times, how many examples do you require and you refused to answer...right?
Now that I give you two you ignore them completely and introduce features that are irrelevant to the post.
Well...if you "can" see what "automatically" transpired then you would realize that I used a mathematical decimal number for pi and multiplied it by 20, converted it into an angular measure using a 360 degrees system.
Then I took the same number pi and divided into 100 and applied it to the same 360 degrees system...that's the number pi multiplied and divided..."and"...and 360 degrees circle.
The result is they intersect at the center line of the Kc.
Now I want you to chose any other number but 360 for the division of the circle and see where the two lines intersect. I guarantee that it is nowhere near the KC center line.
IOW....you can only conclude from this illustration that the ancients used a 360 degrees system and knew pi to at least 3 decimal places. If you elect to neglect this simple evidence then eventually, in time, you will become the only individual to do so.
> But this only works if you put the mid-line of the
> King’s Chamber 21 royal cubits south of the face
> of the Great Step, which itself is actually within
> an estimated 3” of the East-West axis of the
> Pyramid’s base.
> But why is the King’s Chamber 21 royal cubits
> south of the face of the Great Step?
> Why isn’t it centred over the E-W axis of the
> Pyramid’s base as is the Queen’s Chamber?
As you claim...> It is where Khufu or his architect wanted it to be...!
Why should I tell you? You don't read what I post and consistently drift off into your own world.
> I wrote, ‘Then please kindly explain to me what
> exactly it is that you are posting here.
> Thank you.
You above...please...give me strength...!
> You write, ‘There is an Upper chamber that is
> located central to the pyramid...is there a reason
> why it is located central of the structure?
> Yes, it is where Khufu or his architect wanted it to be.
Now you know why you lack understanding of the Giza site...everything is there because of the architect...right?
That puts you right back to the beginning when you first studied this site.
How many years...30?
What a waste.
Best.
Clive
