Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ‘What evidence would you like MJ?
> If I give you one more example would you be
> satisfied?
>
> To which MJ replied, ‘How about your describing
> step-by-step what you believe was the sequence of
> the planning of Khufu’s pyramid...
> Clive reponded, ‘That's not what I asked...read
> again.
> How many examples do you require to convince you...
> MJ resonded, 'I think I have good reason to believe that your
> ‘examples’ will be yet more dimensions that you
> find 'meaningful'
Clive again:
I think you have a very bad memory MJ.
You wrote:
> ‘Secondly, you are the one claiming that the AEs measured angles in degrees, therefore the onus is on you to at least provide some supportive evidence.’
Now, for the third time, you have refused to answer my simple question.
How many examples do you require to be convinced that the AE used 360 degrees when constructing the Giza site?
And the following of yours is not worthy of resonding to, in fact I find your assumptive comments somewhat insulting...not to me, but to those who constructed Giza.
> (usually through your adoption
> of units of measurement unknown to the AEs, and
> the manipulation of geodesic or astronomic data
> anachronistic to the 4th Dyn Egyptians), and that
> appear to have been scattered incoherently
> throughout the Pyramid and its passages and
> chambers.
> Well, I need something more substantive than this,
> Clive.
> The original plan of this Pyramid has yet to turn
> up (I doubt it ever will) and you seem not to have
> any independent textual evidence to support your
> hypothesis.
> It is mostly because of this that I suggest...
Do me a favor...don't suggest anything...
> At least in this way – assuming that your proposed
> planning sequence is coherent and consistent
> throughout the entire Pyramid – you would, IMO,
> add some weight to your hypothesis.
To begin...
you wouldn't know if it were coherent and consistent so why would I bother treating you to a special presentation?
And please, since you are aware of all my work, explain to me what my hypothesis is...even I am curious to know?
> I was under the impression that your focus was on
> Khufu’s pyramid, but you refer to Giza.
You are too easily impressed. Why would I focus all of my work on a single pyramid? I know as much about the other two at Giza plus the Bent, North, Medium, Step, et al.
> Well, my suggestion of a step-by-step recreation
> applies equally to the Giza necropolis.
I have told you often...if you do not understand the outside then you will never understand the inside.
A step-by-step of the exterior is on my web site and, according to your previous statements, you have visited it many times. So why must I repeat what is available for all to read?
> The Giza site designed and set out to the
> inch/finger...!
> Time to rewrite history.
>
> “...to the inch…”, eh?
> Oh dear, this does not bode well...this does not
> bode well at all...
You see MJ...math "never" lies.
Yes...to the "inch"...and the numbers have been confirmed true...!
> But, Clive, my dear fellow, you need to know about
> a history before you can rewrite it!
I do know about it...you keep telling me...over...and over...and over again...!
And that's why I study Giza...to separate the fanciful from reality...to unravel the truth from fiction.
Best.
Clive
