Don Barone Wrote:
...
> For my benefit could you point out the incorrect
> numbers and angles in said drawing ? Could you
> point out the erroneous assumption I have used ?

The burden is on you.

Could you point out your methodology?
Could you point out how you measured the pyramid?
Could you point out the scale of your drawing?
Could you point out your references and referees?

> If the data I have used is in error ...

Could you point out what your data is?

> ... it is you who are ignoring the scientific way.

Could you point out how questioning a proposed idea is not scientific?

> this pyramid is simply a geometric rendering of
> some simple measurements.

Your simple geometric rendering is not the pyramid.

> Either the numbers I have used are correct or they are not.

Could you point out that they are correct.
You are not even using measurements of the pyramid.
If this were science, you would use measurements.

> it is up to you to disprove my geometry ...

It is not "your" geometry. It is just geometry.
That is how geometry works. Diagonals produce squaring.

> ... no amount of mumbo jumbo and slight of hand
> will make this go away.

It is "mumbo jumbo and slight of hand."