Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Anthony,
>
> I have Robert's books and have also read them. I
> am merely trying to ascertain which of the options
> Robert views as most likely in terms of his OCT.
>


> Does he believe that a high civilisation existed
> c10,500BC (11,500BC)?


Scott,


I don't think this is the right question to ask to an alternative historian like Robert. His theory is based on 'past astronomical situations' and he made his conclusions. Actually, that is all he really did. He bases himself on the things he observes ('past astronomical situations', of which I still really 'wonder' how accurate they can be, and the location of the pyramids of Giza), not on the things that are supported by evidence (the Upper Paleolithic civilization). I think he has not much trouble that such civilization simply did not exist. That's why he is an alternative historian.

By the way, I don't think Robert's gonna give you some clarifications. You attempted fruitlessly to get some already some time ago.


Ronald.