Scott Creighton Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------->

> SC: Ronald, I did not start this thread to discuss
> the merits or otherwise of my own theory - I have
> offered possible explanations to the questions you
> present above in various other threads on this
> board.


Your 'explanations' have no scientific value whatsoever.


I repeat. Imo, you have no right to criticise Mr. Bauval.

1) you obviously used his invalid theory to build your theory upon, which, consequently and logically, is invalid too,

2) actually, by doing this, you used the same anomalies

Conclusion ; I am convinced it is very hypocrite to refute an older theory that nevertheless was good enough for you to build your own upon.


Ronald.