Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

If a correlation with Orion
> cannot be found for these structures then the OCT
> can be reduced to nothing more than cherry-picking
> by Bauval (what fits is in, what doesn't is out)
> and the whole edifice of the theory collapses.


Scott,


Because your 'GOCT' obviously is based on Bauval's 'OCT' and because Bauval's 'OCT' has been proven numerous times to be scientifically wrong/unproven, imo, you are in no position to criticize him.

You asked him ; 'How exactly was such detailed information, presumably along with the naked-eye observational error of Menkaure/Mintaka, passed down through 8,000 years? Simply saying the alignment to 10,500 or 11,500 is a 'problem' won't do.'

A lot of people asked you the same question, because this anomaly invalidates your own theory too. I really do not understand where you get the guts to ask Bauval how the information was passed down ànd survived 8+ millenia, while your 'GOCT' is based on a so- called 'lost civilization' that 'observed Orion in 10.550 BC', thus also, like in Bauval's 'OCT', creating an unexplicable time-gap of 8.000 years.


Ronald.