cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Trying so hard to pretend you know what you are
> > talking about....here's a question for you how
> > many days of snow on the ground do they have on
> > the Salisbury plain - you obviously already
> know
> > this or you wouldn't have made a claim - so
> tell
> > us.
>
> I guess we can add sleds on snow to the list of
> simple physics you don't understand.

If you say so but my knowledge of how things works led to the collapse of your silly funicular idea. My knowledge also used an experiment to show that your claim to understand ancient Egyptian was incorrect. I've shown that every aspect of your goofy ideas don't work.

A sled's
> runner works by turning the surface of the ice or
> snow under it into water. It then glides on this
> water.

'Runners' on a 25 ton load? Really? LOL. Flat sled Cladking

If there is insufficient weight then the
> friction is very high. The ideal amount of weight
> is driven by ambient temperature and weight per
> area.

Could we see your calculations as to how large these sledges would need to be so the ground pressure would not cause the sledge - and the object - from sinking into the snow? What? You don't do research, math or experiments you just make claims....

Snow in this part of the world normally
> falls in bands that are more than 20 miles wide in
> the east west direction and often far more.
> England is very far north and often has cold
> weather and snow.

Read about something called the Gulf stream


I've never bothered to
> research it since it's irrelevant but I doubt the
> weather was much different 5000 years ago.

No snow was about the same then as it was then.

Any
> difference would likely mean it was colder and
> dryer.

Or warmer and wetter please show peer reviewed studies of what the weather was at the time of the construction of Stonehenge - ? What oh, right you don't do research you make stuff up ....sorry I forgot your standard excuse.
>
> Horizontal movement from the source of the stone
> to Salisbury requires work primarily to overcome
> friction and to compensate for inefficiency
> involved in not being able to maintain increases
> in momentum due to excessive speed. It is of
> course possible part of the trip was made by water
> but again this is for most practical purposes
> frictionless.

You said and inferred they could do the trip in one day, to quote: "How many days of snow indeed!!! It just took one."

Could they or were you just making stuff up like you always do? Yes or no? One day on snow from quarry to Stonehenge?
>
> You seem to be fixated on the concept of dragging
> stones but in point of fact it is hard to drag
> things even on horizontal surfaces with high
> friction.

Not at all - I'm just watching you making stuff up and doing everything you can to avoid the FACT that when you made your earlier statements you were making stuff up and lying - as usual.

You simply don't and never have had any knowledge about what you are talking about.

Ground pressure - still cannot explain it - look it up.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 07/06/2021 11:26AM by Hans.