Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 19, 2024, 7:41 am UTC    
November 30, 2020 04:10PM
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> This would lead one to believe we have it all
> wrong, zep tepi was not important in fact, or zep
> tepi was not an event or condition at all but
> merely a part of religion and magic as early
> writings suggest.

I do think it's interesting that "36,000 BC" is the approximate time science suggests the first human might have arisen. Perhaps the pyramid builders considered this such a momentous event that it would be apparent exactly what "zep tepi" was. It was the time of the mutation that tied the speech center to higher brain functions and allowed complex language to arise.

If this is the case though it would seem to fall under the heading that we have it all wrong. It means that Bauval can be right but only in a left handed sort of way. But we'd still have to believe that this was so important to the great pyramid builders that they'd upend their entire culture for generations to commemorate the first human. The strength of complex language requires generations to have much affect.

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
Subject Author Posted

36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

Hermione November 29, 2020 09:05AM

Re: 36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

Hermione November 29, 2020 09:08AM

Re: 36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

cladking November 30, 2020 01:20PM

Re: 36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

cladking November 30, 2020 04:10PM

Re: 36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

Hermione November 30, 2020 05:34PM

Re: 36,400 BC: The Historical time of the Zep Tepi Theory

Hans December 02, 2020 10:45AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login