Hermione Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The dispute over the “Zep Tepi” has a final
> answer. The
> Giza Original Project is uncovered, after 20 years
> of my
> researches. Not only Pyramids or Sphinx, but
> other
> monuments connected to the stars, perfectly
> aligned at
> the beginning of the Golden Age of Osiris: i.e.
> 36,400
> BC. A new scientific research, explaining the
> remote past
> of Egyptian Civilization.
>
> Many conjectures have been made concerning the
> monumental complex of Giza. Some of these fall
> within the theories of the so called “independent
> school of Egyptology”, of which they constitute a
> great part. It is undeniable that “academic”
> Egyptology has greatly contributed to our
> knowledge of a unique and incomparable
> civilization, incredibly developed socially,
> artistically and scientifically. Unfortunately,
> academic Egyptologists have also persisted in
> misattributing some archaeological finds to
> Dynastic Egyptians, which I believe have little to
> do with that civilization. This has created
> confusion among researchers and has affected our
> comprehension of the prehistory of Egypt. (Armando
> Mei)
>
> [www.academia.edu]

I personally believe zep tepi was an event as suggested by the Pyramid Texts but Bauval's thesis that it was a time period or a reminder of some event or condition seems highly implausible. That they would so carefully, meticulously, and accurately record anything at all and then not make it clear what was being remembered seems unlikely. Sure there might be all sorts of things we don't know about such a thing or its potential impact on us but anything of such great importance MUST HAVE BEEN RECORDED in their oral history and MUST HAVE BEEN written down when writing was invented. Instead we have nothing in terms of history from ancient Egypt from before 2000 BC and not even a record from after 2000 BC of exactly what "zep tepi" was.

This would lead one to believe we have it all wrong, zep tepi was not important in fact, or zep tepi was not an event or condition at all but merely a part of religion and magic as early writings suggest. Obviously the "sky was never ripped from the earth" in modern terms so either this is superstition or we misinterpret the words. There's really little in between,

Modern people simply translate and interpret all the terms in such way as we can relate to it. But there is still common sense, logic, and "laws of nature" that necessarily apply to the ancients. We can interpret anything in any way we choose but good hypotheses must "hang together" and I don't believe this applies to this hypothesis about "zep tepi". It's entirely possible the "oct theory" is correct but it's improbable that this represents the time that "nun saw the birth of atum through the eye of horus".

____________
Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/30/2020 01:45PM by cladking.