Anthony Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Once again we see someone proposing a theory about
> what could be, rather than looking at cultural
> evidence to document a theory about what should
> be.
>
> There’s nothing like pulling from completely
> different chapters of The Histories and mashing
> them together as if they were written in the same
> paragraph. And then asserting the theory solves
> problems for which we have no evidence of their
> existence: pollution and oxygen deprivation of the
> Nile.
>
> And shall we also inform the authors that the Nile
> floods were not only reliable from year to year,
> but also substantially well documented by their
> levels?
>
> And, of course, there is that inconvenient fact
> that there is no evidence whatsoever for a “water
> main” that runs 50 miles across Egypt and dumps
> into the sealed bedrock of the Subterranean
> Chamber. Oh wait! Maybe they used Davidovits’s
> magic “pourable rock” to cover over the mouth of
> the 3’ pipe, and archeologists are just too stupid
> to see it.
>
> This “theory” gets four Stargates as my review.
> It’s not the full five because there weren’t any
> aliens involved.


Well said