[nuoviso.tv] (Deutsch)

[www.indiegogo.com] (Englisch)

[www.youtube.com] (Deutsch)

[www.youtube.com] (Englisch)

Classic line:

“New empirical measurements will lead to amazing answers about the construction, age, and purpose, of the last truly remaining [sic] wonder of the ancient world.”

It seems to be characteristic of these things that they know in advance just exactly what their “empirical” results will be—and what the implications of these results will be.

Note that they claim to have already taken a sample of the “cartridge” (kartusche) and that it is “now in the hands of a well known institute for lab analysis in Germany”.

Whenever someone says “new dating methods” something odd occurs: I always hear it as “unproven dating methods”.

We have as our guides and heroes Dominique Görlitz (a latter-day Heyerdahl wannabe) and Stefan Erdmann (an author specialising in conspiracy theory):

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Görlitz

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan_Erdmann

I know I’m concealing it well, but I wouldn’t trust either of them to the end of our road.

M.