Jim Stiinehart Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rebby:
>
> You wrote: "...marries wife of predecessor...."
>
> That has nothing to do with either the Amarna Age
> or the Patriarchal narratives.
>
> By contrast, every story in the Patriarchal
> narratives reflects the ambience of Years 12-14...
> ...yadda yadda....Same. It's all
> Years 12-14 at Amarna, all the way, in every way.
> Same.
>

You do, I should hope, realize the Tudor reference was meant to be ironic. Though, come to think of it, it makes just as much sense as your scenario. Your entire thesis consists of speculations which you treat as facts and use as the foundation for further speculations, which are then treated as facts, which are then used as the foundation for further speculations, etc etc etc, all at enormous length. I see no point in carrying on.