Hi MJ,

Sorry you took it like this. You must not conclude that I consider your work of no value. You may well have come across interesting relations that need to be considered. It is logical to consider that the inside of the pyramid was controlled by the 7/11 slope.

Could we agree that within the Great Pyramid there is priority of layout features? I mean that some elements may be considered more important than others and should be explained first, the level of the King's Chamber floor perhaps being the chief?

Using a cubit of 0.5236 m we find that pyramid height gives King's Chamber floor and shaft geometry (at least data for the upper pair is sound) in whole numbers.
Then the simple module (put forward by Legon) that lays out the upper passages of 72 X 163 cubits along the slope, divided into segments of 33 X 75 and 39 X 88, and passage angles correspondingly adjusted to achieve this; relations that may be reasonably explained by the base circuit cubit of 0.5236 m, and even work tolerably well with 0.524 m.

Your system demands smaller tolerances on the part of the builders in order to posit discrepancies as intentional, and opens the door to more complex relations not involving whole cubit numbers. Even so, there must be something you start from, and from which you plot the features one by one? So I wasn't really asking you to explain a specific feature but to give some idea of your method and the preliminary steps to be applied to lay out the major features.

poundr17