Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 1:01 pm UTC    
January 20, 2008 08:15AM
Clive Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Graham:
>
> The King's chamber is set perfectly in place, but
> requires time and drawings to explain the story
> fully.


Not really. It only requires one drawing, that which also explains slope, height and base.

When "the face being equal to that of the height squared" is mentioned by such surveyors as Petrie it's well to remember that it is the only theory that supports his use of the theodolite on the casing stones "in situ"

ie 51º 49' 38.3"

or as he read them

Casing stones, in situ, N. side, by theodolite - 51º 46' 45" ± 2' 7"

IOW about 51º 45 - 51º 49 (Chapter 6 Section 24)

I think that's what is being said

"The only safe test for the reality of intentional connections is their being part of a system."

One drawing thus qualifies.

Graham
Subject Author Posted

Giza. News from 1922

C Wayne Taylor January 19, 2008 04:17PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Dave L January 19, 2008 04:50PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

C Wayne Taylor January 19, 2008 06:05PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Dave L January 19, 2008 06:52PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Don Barone January 19, 2008 06:01PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

fmetrol January 19, 2008 06:12PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Clive January 19, 2008 09:34PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

fmetrol January 20, 2008 08:15AM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Clive January 20, 2008 10:46AM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Clive January 19, 2008 10:42PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Don Barone January 19, 2008 11:08PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Clive January 19, 2008 11:11PM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

C Wayne Taylor January 20, 2008 07:52AM

Re: Giza. News from 1922

Greg Reeder January 20, 2008 01:29PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login