C Wayne Taylor Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> Current Fallacies about History. 83
>
> Recently there was a dispute whether proportions
> of the pyramid of Khufu were based on the area of
> the face being equal to that
> of the height squared, or some of the many
> properties which were really identical
> with this ; all of these being statements of the
> same form, the only question is
> which of them has analogy to any other coincidence
> elsewhere. The only safe
> test for the reality of intentional connections is
> their being part of a system.

I guess "the area of the face being equal to that of the height squared" was already being discussed prior to Petrie's 1883 edition for he mentioned the same in chapter 21, section 145. As for "the reality of intentional connections" I agree and the best way to do this is to explain how "the area of the face being equal to that of the height squared" applies to the chamber positions, if not all three then at least the King's in its unusual off center location.

This is indeed possible.

Graham.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/19/2008 06:17PM by fmetrol.