Hi Hermione and Jon ...

Actually Jon since you do not, nor does anyone apparently have any idea of the date of the structure I really am surprised at the apparent hostilities you are directing toward me lately .

Jon I am all ears awaiting your answer on what purpose this apparent wall had in the overall scheme of things seeing as it is apparently out in the middle of nowhere..

Thanks for your concern Hermione but each day I get a little closer to unravelling Giza and so it is never time wasted. I once heard you could judge how close you were getting to toppling the applecart based on the ferocity of the attacks on one's theory, If this is true I must be getting close.

Regardless here is one more little geometric gem I will share with you all. Firstly I must emphasize that the raidii of the circles have been autocadded and compared to Petrie's measurements by C. Wayne Taylor and they do hit the corners of the pyramids I show, No trickery involved. It is a fact that the radii do define the corners of the pyramids. The fact that I choose to colour them to make them clearer is of no consequence, they fit and no amount of mumble jumble about what do I know means anything. The measurements fit plain and simple.

Now if you read my earlier posting great if not I will repost some of the more interesting ratios ...

Area of Blue divided by area of Black = 1.4025130342230635229624838641838

Yellow diameter divided by Black diameter = 1.4023924057578695151171510617672

Yellow area divided by Blue Area = 1.4022717876677852281755982331191

Yellow circuference divided by Black cicumference = 1.4023289665211062590975254730713

Now if you are like me you might wonder what possible significance can such a random figure as 1.4025130342230635229624838641838 have. I was stumped as well and then I tried something at work today and it became crystal clear.

It started with me multiplying various know measurements by this figure and then it became obvious.

The sides of the Great Pyramid are said to be 440 cubits. Although this is not exact this is what is claimed was meant. The slight difference could be the reason it does not work out exactly as I have measured. The distances should be a bit smaller. Also I have not calculated the possible 7 minute deflection needed to go from my measurements and my north to Petrie's North ( Petrie's angle of chase Line = 44.877 degrees while I have it 45 degrees exactly. Difference at outside point of my Giza Circle which is about 3162 cubits away from the center of P3 is about 11.52 cubits or about an error of 0.36 % )

Revelation:

Side of Great pyramid ........... 440 cubits

1000 x's 1/Phi .................. 618.0339887 cubits

RATIO EQUALS .......... Do I have to do it ? Oh alright ....

1.4046227017043064731922428053765

Error in ratio of 0.00235 or about Black = 1093.46 x 00235 = 2.57 cubits and isn't the difference between what I claim and what Petrie measured ... about 2.86 cubits making the unaccounted for error about 6 inches.

Now if we use the actual measurements of the Great Pyramid instead of 440 this ratio would shrink and so we have to realize .... THAT THE CIRCLES ARE IN PROPORTION TO EACH IN THE RATIO OF THE GOLDEN MEAN. BOTH BY AREA AND CIRCUMFERENCE ... ALL 3 CIRCLES PART OF THE EQUATION

Some think I sell the ancient Egyptians short ... I contend it is you people who wish to deny the brilliance of the design of Giza and as I said .. each new day brings a new insite. So now I ask you to finally realize what Giza is ... The Master Geometric Design of all Times !!

cheers
Don Barone







"There is nothing as impenetrable as a closed mind"
and ..." if everything is a coincidence what is the point of studying or measuring or analyzing anything ?" db



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/21/2008 07:33PM by Ahatmose.