Don wrote

>Who are we to presume it was not there before the depression was formed and that the rest has not been washed or eroded away ?<

So now you're trying to justify your drawing by dating a structure, that you nothing about, to a period of massive erosion. Because to remove the end of the very high promontory would require far more erosion than has happened at Giza since the Old Kingdom.

It's nonsense like that which is one of the reasons that I find your thoughouly modern approach based on a "Flat Plateau" to be so pointless.

You are taking a 19th Century interpretation of the Plateau (Petrie's) and then using 21st century methods on your computer which have nothing to do with the Ancient Egyptians at all. Your results show no understanding of the geography of the plateau or of Ancient Egyptian methods or mathematics etc.

I find nothing of interest or significance in any of your drawings and the more you produce the less claim each has to be taken seriously.

Jon

www.egyptarchive.co.uk