Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 11, 2024, 5:32 pm UTC    
January 09, 2008 12:20PM
"A length, evidently of 2 cubits, marked out by vertical lines in red on a wall of the South Princess' court gave 0m.524 as the cubit of the time, and this length divided into the main dimensions produced a long series of whole numbers with a very small margin of error ..."

A length between two verticals that is not marked in royal cubits is always suspect. There are alternative ways to read such a magnitude.

20.63 inch royals are excessive if you believe Egyptian metrology was a science.

Graham.
Subject Author Posted

Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Dave L January 08, 2008 07:23PM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Kanga January 08, 2008 09:06PM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Dave L January 08, 2008 09:53PM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Hermione January 09, 2008 04:18AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Dave L January 09, 2008 07:35AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Dave L January 09, 2008 07:47AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Hermione January 09, 2008 08:40AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Pete Clarke January 09, 2008 10:24AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Hermione January 09, 2008 10:44AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Pete Clarke January 09, 2008 10:53AM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

Dave L January 09, 2008 01:10PM

Re: Lauer and the Royal Cubit at Saqqara - reference?

fmetrol January 09, 2008 12:20PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login