Quote

Ronald: ...you should think twice and FIRST seek proof before publishing your theories and making the fool of yourself.

SC: I am confident in the work I have presented to this forum. That the Orion Belt asterism can define the dimensions (length and breadth) of the main 3 Gizamids with extraordinary accuracy is FACT. That the placement of the so-called 'Queens Pyramids' concords with the precessional pendulum swing of the Orion Belt stars at maximum and minimum culmination is FACT. That the concavities of Khufu and Menkaure concords with the setting of the Orion Belt stars is FACT. Was all this intended? Well now - that's what I hope to prove. It is, however, my unwavering conviction that all of this concordance we find between Giza and the Orion Belt stars cannot be the result of simple happenchance that drives my search forward.

As for your assertion that I am somehow making a "fool" of myself then all I can say is that if making a fool of one's self gets them nearer to a deeper understanding then that is a risk I am more than willing to take.

Quote

Ronald: Why should 'the custodians' 'answer questions' of which the answers are well-known and obvious ? Why reconsidering over and over again what Giza actually was, while it is obvious that it was a graveyard ?

SC: You seem to be inferring here that we have all the answers concerning the structures at Giza - are you sure about that? I can provide a list of questions I'd like answered if you would oblige?






Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/30/2007 06:08PM by creigs1707.