fmetrol Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

> >
> >
> > Pure speculation. There's not a shred of
> evidence
> > to support this baseless assertion.
> >
> >
> > Anthony
>
>
> I believe MJ has a good point.
>
> What evidence do we have to rule out a
> pre-existing well, a pre-existing shaft and a
> pre-existing subterranean chamber.

The nature of the overall structure. There's nothing in Egypt that would coincide with this kind of deep tunneled structure prior to Khufu.


The well is
> self explanatory as would be the shaft leading
> down to an underground chamber. They don't
> necessarily have to be concurrent constructions.

But there isn't a shred of evidence that says they're not concurrent structures. We can't just start slicing up a building and say certain parts are older just because they aren't all date stamped.




> The naturally occurring rocky outcrop may have
> been a basin for collecting OK or E-dyn rain water
> and the subterranean chamber with its extended
> shafts and pits in the making a very early rock
> cut depository ... of kings.

But in the absence of any evidence whatsoever for this, we have to accept, for the sake of logical argument, that they are all one concurrent project.

Bring me evidence that they were built at different times, and I'll gladly look at it. Asking me to split up the pyramid just because it's possible... well, it's possible aliens built it, too.

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.