Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 8, 2024, 6:44 am UTC    
September 12, 2007 09:53AM
Hermione Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Monty J. Bowen Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> possibly a very important number is the
> half
> > base number;
> > e.g. 6105.
> >
> > Reverse the last two digits and add to the
> first
> > two digits;
> > e.g. (61 + 50)
> > = 111.

Hermione Wrote>.
> Is there any evidence to suggest that any of this
> actually meant anything to the AE?
>..................................................
Hermione,
When I make a statement I qualify it by supplying material to back it up.

When the answer is possibly unclear than I use the words ( could, may be, possibly and so on) indicating an open ended subject.

However I decided to have a quick look at the # 111 and put my system to a test.

If the AEs couldn't put a triangle together as in the Graphics below then there is no way they could have designed the GP.

In Metric First;

By megamont2007

Now in Imperial Feet;(EGN)

By megamont2007

Numbers in the Graphic above are rounded off by the Google SketchUp Program.

Please note;

Base = 364.

Sides = 294.
294/2 = 147.

Height = 231.

...Angles = 5184 & 3816.
Reversed = 4815 & 6183.

Add....... = 9999 & 9999

My Basic Design Theory is "based" on the following using the relative level of the top of the South East Socket Block;
The three remaining S/Blocks have higher RLs thus reducing the over all height of the GP.

Height = 147.

Side = 231.

R/Cubit = 525

There is plenty more info. in the Metric Graphic when the numbers are extended to 4 places.

Copyright © Monty J. Bowen 2009 All Rights Reserved.Reproduction Prohibited.

Regards,
Megamont.
Wisdom is divided into two parts; (a) Having a lot to say and (b) Not saying it.

[geometricalinspirations.googlepages.com]
Subject Author Posted

Orion Alignment

Monty J. Bowen September 04, 2007 12:01AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Ronald September 04, 2007 04:11PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Anthony September 05, 2007 08:26AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Monty J. Bowen September 05, 2007 10:14PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Anthony September 06, 2007 08:40AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Jammer September 06, 2007 09:17AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Monty J. Bowen September 07, 2007 08:01AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Jammer September 07, 2007 02:35PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Anthony September 07, 2007 02:43PM

O/T Decimal System

David Johnson September 08, 2007 09:11AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

Hermione September 08, 2007 09:49AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

David Johnson September 08, 2007 09:56AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

Hermione September 08, 2007 10:24AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

David Johnson September 11, 2007 02:34AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

Byrd September 08, 2007 03:13PM

"Beyond Their Reckoning"?

L Cooper September 09, 2007 08:25AM

Re: "Beyond Their Reckoning"?

Byrd September 10, 2007 10:33AM

Re: O/T Decimal System

Monty J. Bowen September 09, 2007 05:57AM

Re: Orion Alignment

Monty J. Bowen September 10, 2007 02:23AM

Addendum

Monty J. Bowen September 10, 2007 06:13AM

Re: Addendum

Hermione September 10, 2007 09:20AM

Re: Addendum

Monty J. Bowen September 12, 2007 09:53AM

Re: Addendum

Warwick L Nixon September 12, 2007 08:04PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Greg Reeder September 10, 2007 02:41PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Warwick L Nixon September 12, 2007 07:45PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Hermione September 13, 2007 02:15PM

Re: Orion Alignment

Greg Reeder September 13, 2007 02:27PM

**Thread closed**

Hermione September 13, 2007 02:49PM



Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.