Graham Chase Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> AS "The pyramid of Menkaure wasn't even imagined
> at the time Khafre chose his pyramid site. The two
> cannot be related in a reverse chronology."
>
> This is your opinion rather than a statement of
> fact as you are presenting it.



No, it is how the Egyptian culture worked. Studying the culture, rather than AutoCad drawings would help you to understand why it is true.



>
> If there was a plan then clearly it was imagined.



There is no evidence for a funerary "plan" spanning multiple generations. That is something you would understand if you studied the culture rather than a calculator.



> In the plan, The 2000c Giza diagonal was the
> design feature that linked them and the
> orientation of the line to north suggests the line
> was put in place after Khufu's and before
> Khafre's.


This has no bearing on Menkaure's pyramid, which, as I stated, was not even imagined at the time Khafre chose his location.





>
> The fact that G2 axis is HALF WAY between G1 and
> G3 on this line (as Chris also describes) is what
> you would call 'a coincidence'. I find this
> opinion very unlikely too.



You are welcome to find an educated, informed, logical statement to be "unlikely", but people may want to know why, and for that you can produce nothing but more coincidences and speculations.

We have three thousand years of burials, and this would be the ONLY one that broke tradition.

Why?

Anthony

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him think.