Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 5, 2024, 5:15 am UTC    
August 05, 2007 07:06AM
Joe: "If it was so important to the builders of the GP for the South KC shaft to line up with just that one star in Orion's belt, why did they allow the angle to vary by more than 5 degrees?"

This initial variation of the slope 39.2 + 50.54 + 45 degs was probably carefully considered as the mean of these three angles is more or less 45 degs or sqd 7 - the angle of incline for the final 42.75 m to the top end in the core masonry.


In Badawy's proposal, the shaft is targeting the distinctive 3-star asterism in the centre of Orion.


The centre E/W axis of the sarcophagus chamber is offset 21 cubits from the E/W centre axis of the pyramid. If the floor lines of both the north and south shafts are extended down to where they intersect below the chamber's floor, the point of intersection is 22 cubits from the E/W centre axis of the pyramid.


The outlets of both shafts high above in the core masonry are close to being at the same level above the base of the pyramid, which means the shafts were probably designed with symmetry in mind - the basic 'framework' for the design based on sqd 7 for the south shaft and sqd 11 for the north shaft. To achieve this quasi-symmetrical design, even though the chamber is offset from the centre E/W axis of the pyramid, means the slopes of both shafts had to be different.

If the aim was to create a symmetrical design that 'targeted' a specific star, the North or Pole Star, Thuban in the northern part of the sky, and Orion in the southern part of the sky, then a bit of juggling with the initial angle of inclines of the slopes was needed, and a slight adjustment to the slope at the top end of the north shaft. The end result is an elegant design that accomplishes what may have been an attempt to provide the Dual king with several options for his celestial afterlife, realized by creating a harmonious dual shaft symmetrical design, reflecting his rule over the Two Lands.

CT
Subject Author Posted

With Astronomy you can't change the 'facts

Richard Fusniak August 02, 2007 01:40PM

But you can disagree on them

Jon_B August 02, 2007 03:35PM

Re: But you can disagree on them

Principia August 02, 2007 07:31PM

That depends...

Anthony August 03, 2007 05:34AM

correction

Chris Tedder August 03, 2007 06:15AM

Once again ...

Hermione August 03, 2007 06:36AM

Re: correction

Anthony August 03, 2007 10:40AM

Re: That depends...

Jeff van Hout August 03, 2007 10:48AM

Re: That depends...

Dave L August 03, 2007 10:56AM

Re: That depends...

Principia August 03, 2007 12:11PM

Re: That depends...

Anthony August 03, 2007 03:10PM

Re: That depends...

Principia August 03, 2007 10:22PM

Seqeds and Boogleys

Anthony August 05, 2007 03:30PM

Re: With Astronomy you can't change the 'facts

Dave L August 03, 2007 07:56AM

Re: With Astronomy you can't change the 'facts

Scott Creighton August 03, 2007 08:33AM

Re: With Astronomy you can't change the 'facts

Warwick L Nixon August 03, 2007 08:43AM

Re: With Astronomy you can't change the 'facts

Dave L August 03, 2007 08:51AM

Another image

Richard Fusniak August 03, 2007 12:58PM

Re: Another image

Joe_S August 03, 2007 03:27PM

Re: Another image

Chris Tedder August 05, 2007 07:06AM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login