Rick Baudé Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I wasn't fooled,

> I understood everything KK said

And forgot to reference evidence any names, or archaeology sites to back up the claim.

> and referred to.

Generalizations aren't science, it's hearsay.

> She didn't change a thing.

Of course not, she didn't provide specifics, so what is there to change in a vague generalization and bogus analogy?

KK wrote (copy and paste quote): "Interesting how the Europeans have no problem with earlier populations in the Americas.
It's reminiscent of the horrendous abuse and vitriol spilled over acceptance of plate techtonics."

What the hell does plate tech have to do with when the Americas were populated? And just exactly who are the not-named Europeans who have "no problem" in believing "earlier populations" in the Americas? Those who can't write site reports or read behind pay walls?

And since this thread was left to guess at who these un-named Euros were, I did just that and guessed at what Eros she was referring to...does Pedra Furada ring any bells about Europeans who believed in "earlier populating" of the Americas that were fooled by monkey tools? That analogy is on topic to peopling of the Americas KK mentioned, plate tectonics are not and are nothing more than a diversion from the evidence.

If you weren't "fooled", then you are not a European who believed the Americas were "populated earlier" and weren't fooled by geofacts and monkeys. Thanks for the reply backing up just what I claimed.