Stephen Tonkin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The effect, if caused by a moon (or moons) would
> be much more (as in several orders of magnitude
> more) noticeable on the moon; no such effect has
> been noticed.

Well that kills that thought then.

> As a general point, I have been unable to find
> anything about this on the NASA or ESA web sites
> and also nothing in the Monthly Notices of the RAS
> (the most recent I have is last week's). I wonder
> where/if Dougherty has published. Until there is
> more real information on this, we are limited to
> speculation. The "dynamo" theory in the BBC
> article is obviously one possibility; as is the
> notion that the Cassini instruments may have been
> measuring something subtly different to that
> measured by the Pioneer/Voyager instruments. Or it
> may be something else. Interesting!
>
> --
> Best,
> Stephen
>
>
> "The Truth shall set your free... But first it
> will infuriate you!"


More sensitive instruments, along with better computer system, sounds very reasonable.

Regards,
Lobo-hotei
lobo


Treat the earth well, It was not given to you by your parents, It was loaned to you by your children.
Native American Proverb