wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > A potato can be defined as a vegetable. That
> does not mean that that a vegetable
> > can be defined as a potato. But you could say
> that a potato is an example of a root
> > vegetable.
>
> Lousy analogy a potato is not the inverse of a
> vegetable! LOL


Well I was trying to simplify it to try and help you understand. It seems I failed.


>
> > In a similar way...
>
> It is not a "similar" way at all!!!
>
> Your logic here is reverse or inverse twisted
> logic!


Coming from you I take that as a compliment.


>
> > ...the inverse of frequency is not a
> definition of time, but it is the time over
> > which something that repeats is measured.
>
> What you just said, of course, makes no "real"
> sense!
>
> When you are measuring "time", you are always
> "repeating" by definition regardless of your
> desperate attempts here to try to suggest that
> time is linear and that it accumulates!
>
> I am sorry, but I just don't buy your garbage!
>

Like Tommi I'm not interested in discussing this with you anymore. You should try talking to Alice. She is much better at listening than you are, and thats saying something -> [www.pandorabots.com]

Simon