wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Again, I will continue to disagree with you on
> this CRITICAL issue.
>
> Time even counted in days and years also just
> repeats in according to a specific frequency of
> Earth cycles around itself and the SUN. So, I will
> continue to maintain my scientific definition of
> time and its direct inverse relationship to
> frequency.
So does time suddenly disapear if the solar system does ? We measure time is days and years because we live on a planer in a solar system that has these cycles. But that says nothing at all about the nature of time. Time does not repeat, the planetary cycles repeat but time itself flows from one planetary cycle to the next without 'taking any notice' of the fact our measurement system has moved from one cycle to the next.
Your definition is not scientific. Its nonsense.
>
> When you say "But its meaningless as a definition
> of time - time itself is a broader concept and
> it's not only related to things that repeat (which
> frequency is)". This is just WRONG at its core!
>
> This naive expectation of yours that time is
> "linear" and does not repeat is boggus at best!
> You have ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE TO MAKE SUCH A
> STATEMENT when I have plenty of evidence to make
> my statement...
>
No you don't have any evidence. You have this picture in your head of how you think everything should be, and then you transpose that onto reality as if it fits. In reality, the only place it fits is in your head.