wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Of course there are extra dimensions.
> String/Matrix theories clearly suggest it...

What is "Matrix" theory ?

>
> Also, I was not talking about their theory, but
> the general concept of dark matter...

There is no "general concept of dark matter". It is a theory with specific connotations that you choose to ignore.

>
> > Not at all. I believe in many things I cannot
> touch or see. You are the fool.
>
> The way I see you're the fool!
>

Well maybe. But you seem more foolish to the informed observer.


>
> > You believe in something physicists have
> invented to describe something that
> > doesn't agree with their own picture of the
> universe - and you neither
> > understand their picture of the universe nor
> the explanation they have
> > created to explain the discrepancies.
>
> That is NOT the case at all. What is Obvious is
> that the visible Universe is only just about 4% or
> maybe even less. Look around the sky at night, it
> is all pretty much DARK...
>

I get the impression that confusion reigns in your world. Have you ever asked anyone a question ?


>
> So calling something DARK does meet the basic
> observation of what the eye can see and,
> therefore, it is LOGIC! Now, the fact that the
> traditional theories are still struggling to
> explain what it is, is a separate issue. IMHO,
> space (ALL SPACE) is just a wavelength...That is
> my explanation and not theirs!
>

Thats meaningless. Completely meaningless.


>
> > Why did you say that other radio frequencies
> would find it then ?
>
> Because everything is vibrating at a particular
> frequency...(x, y, z, f)
>

You must read up on the theory of dark matter. Its not as simple as it may seem to you.


> > When did I say that ? You really need to
> discuss whats being discussed and
> > not whats in your head.
>
> You said that not everything is EM! or that not
> everything is tied or explained by EM, or
> something like that!!!
>
> Don't you remember what you say any more?
>

I remember, the problem is that you don't understand.

>
> Since Astronomers are now finding star-less
> galaxies, then the evidence of DARK stuff out
> there is becoming more firm, vs. just
> nothingness...
>

Oh you really don't understand the issues here. The reason for the theory of dark matter is to do with the gravitational effects of the observed matter in gallaxies not accounting for the motion of the galaxies. Its not as if the alternative is "nothingness" at all. The alternative is that we don't understand gravitation fully. And if you can find me someone that rekons we do I will show them why they don't. The fact is the only reason I made such a bold claim is that I know fully well no one at present can. But you make bold claims without having the first clue what you are talking about. And you go on and on and on doing so. Do you not care whether you are right in any way ?