wirelessguru1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> > And that is why you are completely wrong.
>
> You wish!
>

Its not about wishing for anything - I'd much prefer it if you were right. But you're not.

>
> > The only way it interacts with EM (again if
> it exists) is in gravitational lensing.
>
> and why would that be!? Why is that the "only"
> way!?
>

Well I'm not going to write a chapter here when I'm not the best person to do so as I don't really believe it exists as they propose (my own belief is that dark matter, dark energy, mirror matter, gravitational leakage, the nature of gravity itself and QM are all better explained by the exitence of extra dimensions) - but as you are talking about their theory you should really know more about what their theory is -> [en.wikipedia.org]


>
> > No but dark matter is an hypothetical
> invention
>
> I suppose that you only believe in things that you
> can touch and see!


Not at all. I believe in many things I cannot touch or see. You are the fool. You believe in something physicists have invented to describe something that doesn't agree with their own picture of the universe - and you neither understand their picture of the universe nor the explanation they have created to explain the discrepancies.


> It was needed for the
> equations, so you got to call it something!
>

You so miss the point.

>
> Also, what do you think happens when stuff gets
> into a black hole!? Is that hypothetical too!?
>

Well yes it is. Very much so.


> > and if it does exist then its not going to be
> found with EM -
> > thats why its called "dark" !
>
> No, that is not why it is called dark!!!
>

Why did you say that other radio frequencies would find it then ?

>
> Again, we cannot detect all EM waves...Why did you
> think that we could!?
>

When did I say that ? You really need to discuss whats being discussed and not whats in your head.