Dave L Wrote:
> So you are happy to rely on that as a basis for
> your personal theories?

What "personal theories" ? You're the one who belongs with the flat earthers !

> I aint, which is why I have not addressed the Red
> pyramid - I suspect it will be somewhere between
> the extremes of the results quoted, but I have no
> idea where.

Or you could go with the latest, most up to date, results which involved digging the base out to observe the settlement.

> That's the methodological difference.

Don't make me laugh ! You ain't got a methodology ! You belong with those for whom a theory is dearer than a fact.

Are you going - ever - to explain to us why Petrie didn't address MMP10 ? After all he was writing a decade after Peet....

Or are you going to provide the reference for Verner's non-existent "survey" of the Step ?

John