Re: Coincidence?

Home

Discussion Forums

Papers

Authors

Web Links

May 17, 2024, 10:21 am UTC

In: The Hall of Maat > Ancient History - Ancient History and Archaeology > Topic

Goto: Forum List • Create A New Profile • Log In

Ancient History • Ancient Egypt • Laboratory • Humanities • Apocalypse • Paper Lens • Coffee Shop
Exhibitions, Conferences, Lectures, Journals • Alternative Geometry and Numerology

Anonymous User

September 27, 2001 01:35PM

<HTML>Hi Robert,

> The chances of a 45 degree angle linking the pyramids through
> 'coincidence' are zero. It is clear that there was a
> deliberate intent to lay out the three pyramids in this way,
> the question is why?

Rather the question is; knowing that the AEs aligned the SE corners so precisely why do you believe they were also innacurately correlating each pyramid to a particular belt star in Orion? As you have experience working in construction I wonder whether it's common practise to position buildings both precisely for certain geometrical considerations and at the same time imprecisely to create an artistic resemblance with something else.

As Anthony <a href=""></a>
<a href="[www.thehallofmaat.com]; - had Menkaure's pyramid been built to the same dimensions as Khufu's and Khafre's there would be absolutely no basis for the Orion correlation.

I'm particularly baffled as to how you can accept that these 3 pyramids were positioned precisely on a 45 degree NE - SW line and yet they are also innacurately correlated with the position of 3 stars.

I'm also still waiting to hear your response as to why you decided s3h = the constellation of Orion. John Legon states that we cannot ascertain whether the AEs thought of Osiris as a constellation or just a single star. Indeed if we accept that Isis=Sirius wouldn't Osiris also be represented by just one star?

This must be explaine within the cultic
> context and motives of the builders: to connect the defunct
> kings and their pyramids to their afterlife destination to
> Orion. The Orion-Giza correlation theory provides a very
> plausible explantion indeed that dovetails perfectly with
> this cultic context and motives.

Rather your preconceived hypothesis of an admitedly imprecise correlation dovetails neatly with your own highly selective interpretation of the PTs. Weird huh?

I'm also interested in whether you believe the Giza pyramids were constructed as tombs for Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure. If not then can you please explain how you can use the funerary texts from later pyramids to bolster your case for the Orion correlation theory. If you agree they were tombs could you drop GH a line and suggest he gets round to correcting his novels soon.

KRs,

Duncan</HTML>

Reply Quote

Subject	Author	Posted
Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 07:37AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 08:23AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 08:28AM
Re: Coincidence?	Mikey Brass	September 27, 2001 08:43AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 08:46AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 08:44AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 08:48AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 08:53AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 08:58AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 09:35AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 09:41AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 09:56AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 10:15AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 10:42AM
Re: Coincidence?	John Wall	September 27, 2001 10:55AM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 09:38AM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 09:53AM
Robert's Opinion and More	ISHMAEL	September 27, 2001 10:40AM
Re: Robert's Opinion and More	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 12:06PM
Re: Coincidence?	John	September 27, 2001 11:47AM
Re: Coincidence?	Robert G. Bauval	September 27, 2001 12:36PM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 01:35PM
Re: Coincidence?	ISHMAEL	September 27, 2001 02:00PM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 02:07PM
Re: Coincidence?	ISHMAEL	September 27, 2001 01:56PM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 03:09PM
Re: Coincidence?	John	September 27, 2001 03:56PM
Re: Coincidence?	Mikey Brass	September 27, 2001 04:16PM
Re: Coincidence?	Robert G. Bauval	September 27, 2001 04:33PM
Re: Coincidence?	ISHMAEL	September 28, 2001 08:09AM
Re: Coincidence?	Mikey Brass	September 27, 2001 01:12PM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 01:41PM
Anthony's Error	ISHMAEL	September 27, 2001 02:26PM
Re: Anthony's Error	Claire	September 27, 2001 02:36PM
Short Answer	ISHMAEL	September 27, 2001 02:40PM
Re: Coincidence?	R. Avry Wilson	September 27, 2001 04:16PM
Re: Coincidence?	Claire	September 27, 2001 04:23PM
Re: Coincidence?	Anonymous User	September 27, 2001 05:11PM
Wrong Wrong Wrong!	ISHMAEL	September 28, 2001 08:14AM
Can I weigh in on this? lol	Anthony	September 27, 2001 05:50PM
Re: Can I weigh in on this? lol	Mikey Brass	September 27, 2001 06:53PM
Okay, call me dense...	Anthony	September 27, 2001 07:13PM
Re: Okay, call me dense...	Mikey Brass	September 28, 2001 02:14AM
Mikey/Avry	Anthony	September 28, 2001 06:21AM
Re: Mikey/Avry	Mikey Brass	September 28, 2001 06:33AM
Re: Mikey/Avry	Anthony	September 28, 2001 09:36AM
Re: Mikey/Avry	Stephen Tonkin	September 29, 2001 12:01AM
Stephen	Anthony	September 29, 2001 06:15AM
Re: Stephen	Stephen Tonkin	September 29, 2001 09:38AM
Re: Stephen	Anthony	September 29, 2001 04:43PM
Re: Mikey/Avry	Mikey Brass	October 01, 2001 03:16AM
Eh?	R. Avry Wilson	September 28, 2001 02:29AM
Re: Eh?	Anonymous User	September 28, 2001 04:30AM
Re: Eh?	Peter VanderZwet	September 28, 2001 05:03AM
Claire/Anthony	R. Avry Wilson	September 28, 2001 02:48AM
Re: Coincidence?	sandy	September 29, 2001 05:20PM
Re: Coincidence?	sandy	September 29, 2001 05:44PM
Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	Anthony	September 30, 2001 05:44AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	September 30, 2001 09:37AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	Anthony	September 30, 2001 07:34PM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	September 30, 2001 08:20PM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 05:30AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:35AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 05:42AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:45AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	Anthony	October 01, 2001 07:21AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 07:38AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 05:24AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:31AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 05:39AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:55AM
According to my Analysis....	Anthony	October 01, 2001 07:27AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	John Wall	October 01, 2001 07:44AM
Re: Accuracy in the 3rd Millenium BCE	sandy	October 01, 2001 05:58AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login