Home of the The Hall of Ma'at on the Internet
Home
Discussion Forums
Papers
Authors
Web Links

May 20, 2024, 12:21 am UTC    
Anonymous User
September 19, 2001 12:20PM
<HTML>Kat, Ishmael,

I'm really not sure we should be pinning our hopes on them like this tho'. Have a butchers at this letter from June in the <a href=""></a>
<a href="[www.geocities.com] post.</a> Perhaps the planned military campaign will topple the Taliban and push the Northern alliance into power but I wouldn't be so sure it would result in a lasting peace.

KRs,

Duncan


"No Stingers to Afghanistan's Northern Alliance," The Washington Times 18 June 2001 p A16

To the Editor:

In your article on Afghanistan "Opposition Predicts New Taliban Offensive," a spokesman for the opposition Northern Alliance calls for the United States to give his faction Stinger missiles (World, June 15). This is the worst possible policy for the United States. The missiles would be ineffective and would fall into the hands of Islamic radicals.

In the 1980s, the United States supplied the Afghan mujaheddin with shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles in order to level the playing field with Soviet forces. This strategy worked because the Soviets relied on air power, particularly helicopters, to reduce casualties. By contrast, the Taliban have shown no compunction against waging bloody ground campaigns. Because of the recruitment efforts of Deobandi clerics in Pakistan’s Islamic schools, the Taliban have a virtually unlimited supply of troops. Supplying the Northern Alliance with Stingers will not change this situation.

Moreover, the Northern Alliance is a loose confederation of groups, including opium traffickers, warlords, and Iranian-backed Hazara Shi’ites. Their inability to unite after expelling the Soviets opened the door for the Taliban to seize control. Giving this motley crew Stingers is as good as handing these weapons to Islamic militants. In order to avoid this scenario, the U.S. has been trying to buy back the Stingers we gave the mujaheddin for a decade. We can’t allow our hatred of Osama bin Laden to color our judgement. Reversing good policy and sending more Stingers to Afghanistan is a recipe for disaster.

William D. Shingleton

Senior Fellow

National Defense Council Foundation

Editor's Note: Mr. Shingleton was a U.S. delegate to the Six plus Two peace conference on Afghanistan in Tashkent 1999.</HTML>
Subject Author Posted

The evidence against Bin laden

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 06:04AM

Suicide Hijacker' is an Airline Pilot Alive an

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 09:26AM

A letter from Afghanistan

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 09:33AM

National loyalty first (Hekmatyar)

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 09:40AM

Re: National loyalty first (Hekmatyar)

ISHMAEL September 19, 2001 11:19AM

Re: National loyalty first (Hekmatyar)

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 11:56AM

Re: National loyalty first (Hekmatyar)

Katherine Reece September 19, 2001 12:06PM

Re: National loyalty first (Hekmatyar)

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 12:20PM

Re: Suicide Hijacker' is an Airline Pilot Alive an

Duncan Edlin September 20, 2001 05:22AM

Re: Suicide Hijacker' is an Airline Pilot Alive an

Derek Barnett September 20, 2001 05:30AM

Re: Suicide Hijacker' is an Airline Pilot Alive an

Don Barone September 20, 2001 06:50AM

Re: Suicide Hijacker' is an Airline Pilot Alive an

Duncan Edlin September 20, 2001 09:09AM

US 'lacks knowledge to launch land war'

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 12:02PM

Re: US 'lacks knowledge to launch land war'

Katherine Reece September 19, 2001 12:10PM

Re: US 'lacks knowledge to launch land war'

Anonymous User September 19, 2001 12:23PM

Found it!

Katherine Reece September 19, 2001 05:53PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login