<HTML>Anyone with two cerebral neurons hooked together can see you're blowing smoke. You quit in a huff - a cover for your inability to cite a source for all of the copper you'd need to cut millions of pyramid blocks. I'd guess you've now checked your books and know the copper yield was so low as to be unrealistic.
Blame your quitting on my giving you the spin by the tail feathers you deserve (your insults of Davidovits are beyond the pale) or say I'm rude like Morris when she's been polite. Perverse and transparent. Fact: Your end can't hold up so you throw up meaningless insults (is Morris my mother in law?, you ask) and reinvent quarrying with no professional consultation whatsoever. Toss the waste factor aside, throw up some numbers (smoke and mirrors), toss out Klemm's tool marks study (showing Old and Middle Kingdom quarrying with pointed picks), and pretend the copper existed if you want to, but You Lose Bigtime.
Bottom line: You can't build the pyramids with stone tools and the amount of copper needed is not supported by archaeological finds.
You lose Frankie, but be sure to reenter this debate if your old hero von Daniken can bring you copper from his outer spacelings.
Sandy</HTML>
