Hans_lune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

...

> I was wondering if it is a modern 'manufactured'
> site and not ancient at all.

Well ... there's a drawing (second one down) of it here - [archive.org] (437-8) - from 1880. Wiener calls it a "trilithon", and suggests it might be the remains of an enormous dolmen whose other stones might have fallen to the right and left, and are now lying on the ground.

The site appears to be behind Copacabana (written Copacavana in some older works) - [earth.google.com] .

I can't find anything in Cobo (Historia De La Fundación De Lima: 1882) - [archive.org]. In this edition -[archive.org] - mentions of "Copacavana" can be found between 58-67.

This is probably the most informative of all: [www.academia.edu] (184; 200).

Hermione
Director/Moderator - The Hall of Ma'at

Rules and Guidelines

hallofmaatforum@proton.me