Hermione Wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------
>
> Its body is that of a lion -
> [en.wikipedia.org]


I don’t like Wikipedia and in the link you sent from wiki we can see how desproporcional the head of the Sphinx is. We can see he was managed, that your head was carved. I believe she was amazing as a lion.

[www.express.co.uk]

The Sphinx are older than the pyramids, before Khafre time.
The theory of orthodox Egyptologists that the head was made first than the body it is pretty ridiculous. If the Sphinx was older than the pyramids and before Khafre how can she had Khafre ‘s face?
I am wrongly saying Khufu but is Khafre’s face. I am sorry for this mistake fellows.
But there is a disagreement as to whether the head is from Khafre or Khufu. How do Egyptologists not know whose head it is? It just makes me believe more that she had the head of a lion.



>
>

Quote

Farouk El-Baz has suggested that the head
> of the Sphinx may have been carved first, out of a
> natural yardang, i.e. a ridge of bedrock that had
> been sculpted by the wind. These can sometimes
> achieve shapes which resemble animals. (Egyptology
> at the Dawn of the Twenty-first Century: Pinch
> Brock; AUC, 2003; 70-71)

>


I don’t buy it. How Egyptians have the knowledge to built a enormous Sphinx and pyramids and do no know how to make a right proportion to a head. For me it doesn’t fit. It seems like the Sphinx had another face and was carved that’s why it have a desproportional head. It got smaller than the rest of the body.



>
> The problem comes about when attempts to change
> our understanding of history turn out to be based
> on evidence of debatable value.

I believe all evidence is of debatable value. I don’t believe the Egyptologists are open minded. They try hard to fit the discoveries in their line of time in History

Cintia Panizza
——————————-

"Happiness is only real when shared."
Christopher McCandless



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 02/06/2022 08:46AM by Cintia Panizza.