<HTML>In other words, Jim, "no evidence."
Nothing you list constitutes hard historical evidence of the sort left behind by hundreds of documented human cultures from cave-dwellers to Constantinople. What you offer instead are speculations:
>The very, very <i>possible</i> fact that the Ancient Egyptians ...
> This includes the <i>symbolism</i> of eyes to represent the moons as ...
>
> <i>Circumstantial</i> pieces such as Mars is know as the "god of war" ...
>
> Couple this with the <i>possibility</i> that Thomas Van Flandern's double exploded planet hypothesis <i>COULD</i> one day be proven as true ...
>
> All the science technology involved in the <i>encoded</i> information contained in the large Giza pyramid ...
>
> Lastly, take a look at yourself in the mirror. Very large amount of <i>circumstantial proof</i> that humanity's past is not what we think it is/was.
Note how all this "evidence" requires interpretation by someone to even be considered "evidence" at all. It's not quite the same as the staples of real archaeology: houses, burials, pottery, artifacts of all sorts, etc. Such items require interpretation to become bistorically meaningful, but their existence is self-evident. This is not true of a single item you list above.
Best,
Garrett</HTML>
