<HTML>??? They show no signs of Geopolymerisation becuse they are made from natural rocks???
Another question which is and was completely ignored:
- HOW do you explain the several hundreds of quarries all around Egypt like documented in Klemms "Steine und Steinbrüche im alten Ägypten"? With all the typical structures used when blocks were quarried (like the trenches between block boundaries)
- how do you explain the large amount of hard rocks quarried in Giza (which are clearly NOT easily soloublable) and the fact, that the amount matches that of the pyramids? IF the hard stone was used for Geopolymer it must hve been pulverized mechanically, which is much more work than simply pull out blocks.
- If the Egyptians couldn't work stone how do you explain structures like Chentkaus, which was hewn from massive bedrock and partly decorated with niche structures?
- How do you explain the unfinished objects found in the quarries and documented by Klemm? half finished statues, colums, blocks, and and and.
- How do you explain the perfectly finished rock-hewn structures like the ascending passage in the great pyramid, and the rock tombs of the 4th dynasty with their fine reliefs formed out of the bedrock?
- How do you explain the clearly visible breaking patterns in the pyramid blocks in Meidum nd the bent pyramid?
and and and...
Simply ignoring these clearly visible facts again?
I think we are all tired again to hear that some geologist-friend of Davidivits found bound water which he only can explain so and so unless such questions ans much more, like from Archaea, are answered.
As I sayd before: The way of ignoring contradicting facts and belitteling this evidence is a way to form a believe system, not to establish a scientific hypothesis.
FD</HTML>