<HTML>Sandy J. Perkins wrote:
>
> The Morris v Dunn article states that Zeller
> investigated material provided by Egyptologist J.P. Lauer.
> The article states that Zeller gathered the independent data
> having to do with chemically bound water, like the
> electromagnetic sounding data.
This doesn't answer the question.
The article states:<blockquote>Zeller appealed for more samples by emphasizing that more study is needed for such a large monument. However, permission to remove samples was denied; alternative pyramid theories are automatically rejected and ridiculed by the Egyptological community. . . .</blockquote>I've learnt to be cautious of the passive voice. It often serves to conceal information which would give a different picture to the one the writer prefers.
So, again: who exactly did Zeller apply to for samples?</HTML>
